Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Ultimately it’s line managers that determine the success of learning and development

A week or two back I attended an interesting presentation, Great employers need great line managers, by John Purcell, Strategic Academic Adviser, Employment Relations for ACAS and a part-time Research Professor at Warwick University. Here are some notes I took:

  • There is a gap between intended policies and actual practices. What matters is not the policy, but what employees actually experience.
  • There are big variations in employee perceptions of the quality of line management behaviour in terms of people management.
  • Most employees have close ties with their managers; for many, their manager is the organisation.
  • In recent research, 44% of employees say their manager never or rarely coaches them; less than half of employees say their manager provides them with feedback on their performance.
  • In a report this year by the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD), assessing employee attitudes to the recession, only 35% said they trusted senior managers, only 36% have confidence in their managers, and 46% report growing stress.
  • There is so much that managers can do to support l&d: arranging buddies for new employees, organising job enrichment and rotation, providing coaching and guidance, organising secondments, identifying external technical training and conferences, knowledge sharing and running their own briefings and discussions.
  • In another CIPD survey, 44% of employees felt their managers were not very effective at l&d.

John didn't include in his list the important role that line managers play in supporting formal l&d interventions. I was reminded of research often quoted by Charles Jennings, the source of which I have unfortunately mislaid, which showed that the contributions that managers played before and after interventions were much more important in determining success than the contributions of trainers or of learners themselves.

The lesson from all this evidence is quite clear. Unless you recognise that line managers are your most important stakeholder and ensure their commitment to your l&d strategy, you stand little chance of success.

2 Comments:

At 6:54 PM, Blogger Paul Angileri said...

I think you are correct on this topic, and you articulate the importance through an anecdote that reveals a few hidden ways in which our learning and development designs can be foiled.

I a recent case of my own direct experience, a training department was implementing a series of process changes that involved creating software tools that handled their logistics for scheduling and monitoring training of employees. The managers of said employees were then trained on this software so that they themselves could directly handle and monitor the training logistics of their individual groups. This model was chosen for the perceived benefits, those being that rather than always having to go to training, go through the exploration process, have communications get bungled, etc., the managers could simply do nearly everything themselves. The training department in turn also was expected to benefit by having a lot of low-level logistical tasks off-loaded from their lsit of responsibilities, leaving them extra bandwidth to refocus on instructional design and other core functions training departments usually serve.

In this case the "line managers" were the ones being trained and the ones that needed to accept the process and change. The process is still taking place and I have not been updated as to the success of the effort beyond the trial implementation, but on paper the move seemed a good fix for both organizations involved.

The point about employees seeing their manager as "the business" is very true when I consider my own past positions. Employees many times may be too busy to see the larger picture beyond even their boss, and I think we have a tendency to subconciously construct perceptions (right or wrong) about those who are hierarchically our superiors.

 
At 10:34 PM, Blogger Charles Jennings said...

Clive, the research I often quote is from Mary Broad and John Newstrom. you can find it here in an ASTD publication 'Transferring Learning to the Workplace' by Mary Broad and Jack Phillips http://is.gd/1yROd

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home