E-learning on a shoestring
E-learning in the workplace used to be the preserve of the large corporate or public body. Only they were able to afford the necessarily substantial investments in learning platforms and content development and had the large audiences against which these investments could be amortised. And only these major employers had the specialist technical skills and large l&d departments needed to support these investments. Smaller organisations were essentially priced out.
But most people don't work for large corporate or public bodies; they work for the millions of smaller businesses and not-for-profits that make up a significant proportion of any nation's economy. The employees of these smaller organisations also need to learn and develop and to do so as efficiently and conveniently as possible. And don't forget those organisations - typically cottage industries - that provide training services to the big boys, but have had neither the capital nor the technical expertise to integrate e-learning into their offerings.
But this year we have seen a major shift. I personally have been working with a wide range of smaller companies and training providers who want to establish an e-learning delivery capability. Many of my colleagues are doing the same. The formula appears to be pretty consistent:
- Purchase some licenses for one of the more popular rapid authoring tools, typically Articulate / Adobe Presenter (for PowerPoint-based content) or Adobe Captivate (where there's more of an IT training bias). Supplement these if necessary with some tools to help in developing short videos and podcasts. I know there are free authoring tools, but even small companies can afford a few software licenses.
- Use Moodle as a delivery platform, typically externally hosted, perhaps with some customisation. Smaller companies don't need full LMS functionality, so Moodle (perhaps with some extra goodies) will do this job adequately. Training providers will have no trouble using Moodle to provide course web sites to support traditional, e or blended solutions.
- Get a license to Webex, Elluminate or something similar (perhaps even a free web conferencing tool like DimDim) to provide the capability to run live online sessions.
- Train up as many of the training team as possible in content design and development, setting up courses in Moodle and facilitating in a virtual classroom. Not everyone will excel in all these tasks, but at least the whole team will feel involved and empowered. Some technical and creative expertise will be needed, but this can be bought in externally as and when it is needed.
This is e-learning on a shoestring, but it is e-learning that can really deliver. The key is to keep the 'e' elements short and simple and to integrate them cleverly with more traditional approaches. The emphasis, as ever, should be on effective learning, not on playing with technology.









8 Comments:
True--one elearning battle is money. Moodle is a solution for companies not worried about internet security; the smaller companies you mention. Larger companies, or companies with protected information involved, need another solution that intensifies the money battle.
Another battle is theory: from adult learning theory to cognitive load theory, can the training do all that it can to help learners engage? But without file size issues!
B.J. Schone's blog has an interesting post on that battle: http://bit.ly/ONoAx
Thanks Clive.
I will add, find the team member with some level of artistice talent and get them a Photoshop or Fireworks license.
Following that, to keep to the shoestring theme, use Photoshop Elements instead of the full blown version.
Actually, you don't need Photoshop or Fireworks. Get the OpenSource softwares Gimp and Inkscape. If you have to do paper based layouts, use Scribus.
While OS has many solutions to the brand name softwares e-learning developers use, I have yet to find a good substitute for Flash or Captivate (unfortunately).
Great post, Clive!
I'd add - ID inputs are important too. And not all trainers are good at ID - though they may want to believe they are. Cutting budgets elsewhere is ok but not on ID.
I agree with Amit here. I am in exactly such a situation at the moment. I am trying to help the team here (a traditional training team) pick up speed on the tools. But the ID bit is posing to be the biggest challenge.
While the technical aspects of Articulate and Captivate have not been too difficult to explain and some have picked up very quickly indeed, explaining to folks that just importing a PPT into Articulate and exporting it does not an e-learning course make is proving to be more challenging.
The focus tends to become content instead of the learners...
Would love to know if any of you are facing similar challenges.
I too have the same challenge as Sahana. It is easy to teach SME's how to use the tools but that is just a recipe for a boring info dump. A skilled instructional designer makes all the difference in creating eLearning that does what it is meant to do. After all, you can give me a screwdriver but I sure as hell won't be able to fix a transmission.
Not everyone will excel in all these tasks, but at least the whole team will feel involved and empowered. - Probably but you can never tell.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home